Defense Against Alleged PFA Violations and Indirect Criminal Contempt

Mark D. Hauser, Esquire defends individuals accused of violating a Protection From Abuse order in Philadelphia and regional courts, including indirect criminal contempt proceedings.

In an indirect criminal contempt hearing, the accuser must establish that a valid order existed, that the accused had notice of it, and that the accused willfully violated its terms.

The specific wording of the order and the surrounding facts often decide whether a violation can be proven. Each element deserves close review.

A defense may examine the order's exact terms, the timing and evidence of any alleged contact, the accused's notice and intent, and the procedural rights available at the evidentiary hearing.

Speak with counsel before the hearing date. Consultations are available by telephone and appointment.